A Bill to Establish More Tort Law and Compensation Revised

BE IT ENACTED BY THE STATE OF FIRESTONE CONGRESS HERE ASSEMBLED THAT:

A Bill to Establish More Tort Law and Compensation


SECTION 1: All tortious offenses defined hereinafter will be legible grounds to file civil litigation against another party or individual. These offenses cannot be filed on multiple counts (more than one count) within a civil case.

SECTION 2: All effective legislations that interfere/already defined an offense listed within this specific legislation are hereby void and null.

SECTION 3A: ‘Fraud’ is hereby classified as a tortious offense and shall be defined as: the act of manipulating the attention of the public or misleading the general public in believing, supporting, or engaging in anything that requires some sort of influence and approval to give someone power and higher standing, which would subsequently be an accomplishment for that person.

SECTION 3B: Perpetrators of ‘Fraud’ shall be subject to monetary compensation, in which they would be required to transfer $500 to $1250 to the party victimized to this tort. This would be exercised through a court order in which the due time for this transaction would be up to the discretion of the presiding justice, though it cannot exceed a week from the adoption of the court order. If the perpetrator cannot concede to compensation due to insufficient funds, he or she would be charged to the offense defined in section 8.

SECTION 4A: ‘Detinue’ is hereby classified as a tortious offense and shall be defined as: the act of claiming to have greater power over a possession, entity, or business once legally owned by them but relayed to another person, the successor, in which the predecessor denies.

SECTION 4B: Perpetrators of ‘Detinue’ shall be subject to monetary compensation, in which they would be required to transfer $600 to $1300 to the party victimized to this tort. This would be exercised through a court order in which the due time for this transaction would be up to the discretion of the presiding justice, though it cannot exceed a week from the adoption of the court order. If the perpetrator cannot concede to compensation due to insufficient funds, he or she would be charged with the offense defined in section 8.

SECTION 5A: ‘A Bill to Protect the Firestone Court System’ shall be defined as: [A Bill to Protect the Firestone Court System]

SECTION 5B: Section 2A of ‘A Bill to Protect the Firestone Court System’ currently states: “The term “Contempt of Court” shall be defined as, “An act in which an individual interrupts the court process in hopes of stopping it for beneficial reasons to themselves or another, or failing to appear in court when a sufficient amount of time is given to both parties in which both parties are to be present.”

SECTION 5C: Section 2A of ‘A Bill to Protect the Firestone Court System’ shall now state: “The term ‘Contempt of Court’ shall be defined as: “An act in which an individual interrupts the court process in hopes of stopping it for beneficial reasons to themselves or another, or failing to appear in court when a sufficient amount of time is given to both parties in which both parties are to be present, or failing to comply or accomplish an official court order.”

SECTION 6: Therefore, those who fail to comply or accomplish monetary compensation through an official court order shall be charged with Contempt of Court.

SECTION 7: This legislation will be enforced by all court levels of the Firestone Judiciary.

SECTION 8: Upon passage and signage, this legislation will take effect 24 hours after the signage of the Governor of the State of Firestone.


Respectfully submitted to the State of Firestone Congress,

CHIEF SPONSOR:

SerZhukov
Representative

CO SPONSORS:

casuaIIIy
Representative

Rinextel
Speaker of the House

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed after 9 minutes. New replies are no longer allowed.

1 Like

Declared null and void.

6 Likes