no! def not
I think youâre trolling at this point so Iâm just not gonna respond.
For sure! TotallyâŚ
they arenât given assigned states because they arenât being tied down to one state⌠The governor wants 2 general ambassadors and they are helping out with all tasks as decided by myself. Their information comes from me when they need it. Just a blanket excuse to fail a nominee.
dude they didnt KNOW that
. iâd like to point out that the first ambassador did not have any speech, nor anything to say when he was presented
I was brought up and was about to begin when Hec asked what my assignment was for Ambassador, which I said that I didnât have one, and was an Ambassador-at-large.
he literally knew nothing about what duties he was going to fulfill because âhe wasnât told by blast or the governor"
I didnât know what State I was assigned, I wasnât told by blast or the Governor. The duties are the same, but the assignments arenât.
Again, this is the issue. Taking things out of proportion or twisting words. I know full well what my duties are, because Iâm one of the best for the position. Hilarious.
I feel like some congressmen are turning away from the people and just saying, âeh they can surviveâ. Heads up, we suggest these ideas because we clearly know what will work for the people and the department can you just listen to âUSâ.
itâs weird that my last 10 forums have been explaining this exact thing, and i even went on to say that us, as citizens, should keep on hounding congress to maintain their standards. we didnât and now everyoneâs realizing that the problem is very real.
trust me, I know a lot about twisted words, thatâs half the reason I failed my nomination
then tell them that
they literally had 0 clue and didnât tell the senators. looks bad when youâre trying to be confirmed, generally senators want to confirm someone who knows what theyâre doing
I think itâs just that the problem has become so blatant and obvious that itâs really getting to people now, these were two competent individuals who are well respected within the community and for the senate to handle their nominations in the manner that they did is whatâs making people realize
we did tell the senators? i said i was an ambassador at large, not assigned to a state. goodness
The problem is, people who have friends in high places get to high places. people who have a lot of experience, but have no friends in high places end up in the dog house.
This needs to change.
We need to redo the petition clause in the BOR to give it more power. Make it where if you have 300+ signatures then the state can vote on it and if it passes then it becomes the law bypassing the Governor and Congress. Would that fix this situation, no but it would give petitions a purpose and allow the citizens to check congress.
you literally did not have a speech
when you were presented up to give your speech, the stuff you said was along the lines of ânothing else to itâ to which prompted hec to ask you questions in order to get information out of you.
there are no twisting words, itâs what me as a senator saw. if i actually saw you give a speech then me and my colleagues probably wouldve given you an aye
you never said that nor explained it to senate, if you did please prove that you did
@ Congress can we get a recall amendment similar to mayflower
where we would be able to petition for a recall of elected officials if that wasnât clear enough
hec can get you the video, i wasnât recording cause thats dumb. and i would expect the senate to know what âat-largeâ means, we should have to lay out the basics and you fill the rest in, and i didnât get to even start my speech
Can you link to that legislation. That sounds interesting.
yea i literally do not know what that means. considering ill echo what cen and blast were saying before. we are not trained for state relations. you have to explain it to us, we are senators deciding if you should or shouldnât represent our state. if you canât give us the basic outline we canât give you a basic aye