swearing to Satan is just as valid as swearing to God
2 Likes
Can you not comprehend the BILL OF RIGHTS forcing someone to take a religious oath they do not believe in is ILLEGAL
2 Likes
thats not true at all, god offers hope to people and something to look up to. satan cannot be logically looked at in a positive light
1 Like
So we should do away with every type of currency in the United States?
2 Likes
Well it’s an oath of office not an oath of religious beliefs.
1 Like
Thats a bold comparison.
1 Like
Everything you’re saying is subjective and not based on the bill of rights or actual laws.
1 Like
I think most of us can comprehend that the “In God we Trust” phrase is not just there for show.
2 Likes
The Oaths Stay for POST and FFA, nobody is forcing anyone to change their religious views except you. Forcing us to change ours. How is that right? You can’t give everyone equal rights.
FFA is a private academy. We have the right to enforce any policy we choose. In anycase. It’s one word that should make zero difference. Stop trying to force us to say other stuff.
1 Like
FFA is an institution of the state, as defined by law. And I’m not saying you have to remove it, just allow people to be able to exclude the god part and say “So help me.” Or “so I affirm.”
2 Likes
It really should be optional, if someone doesn’t wanna do it, you shouldn’t force it. Its there beliefs.
2 Likes
everything im saying makes sense and you’re just stubborn and ignorant
1 Like
I’m going off of the bill of rights, you’re going off of personal beliefs
1 Like
you’d be surprised by the amount of people who say “so help me dog”
1 Like
Me being a religious person, I don’t think that having “God” included in an oath causes friction of any kind.
1 Like
no im going off common sense
1 Like
I mean end it at so help me.
1 Like
seeing as it’s not my decision
1 Like
well… i mean the topic blew up… and it’s a very hot debate around 'murica, so…
1 Like
Well of course not, because it doesn’t effect you.
1 Like