Petty Court Cases

[DeltaTrigger]

It’s up to the respondent/defendant and their attorneys in the case to dispute the evidence- in pre-trial you can object to pieces of evidence being admitted, if the judge sees valid grounds for the objection, the evidence is thrown out, if all the evidence is thrown out then the case can be dismissed if there is no longer one piece of physical evidence minimum- boom case done

[SerZhukov]

How about, instead of bashing the courts (which makes no sense in this situation), preach the usage of out-of-court strategies to handle these ‘petty’ civil disputes. Alike real life, most civil cases are either (a) dismissed by the court or (b) resolved through out-of-court settlements. That’s going to lower the general amount of civil cases the district court has to preside over.

As for your, I presume ‘proposed solution’:

@MichaeICalabrese

Edit: They should be required to have better evidence than 20 Seconds before the incident cause something else could’ve happened before and we wouldn’t know

The court is always going to examine the evidence during the discovery period and ensure it is in obedience to evidentiary standards. Furthermore, if there is a lack of ‘better evidence’, the opposing party (defense) can just request the dismissal of the case. I don’t know what you mean by ‘better evidence’ either, I don’t think anyone is going to heed to this suggestion considering that it is being made by an unpracticed (I presume) individual.

[Cuxle]

@iLordOfAviation

(NOT SAYING I DO OR DONT AGREE WITH THE POST BUT…)

i think its kinda funny when people take a cop to court with their “proof” just being a video of the cop reading the charges then sending them off to the gulag

like what exactly is this proving? u just saying “no i didnt” isnt gonna get you anywhere

but also what I notice is that when a criminal gets prosecuted & get (previously 72 hours) LEOs celebrate and act like they’ve committed irl crimes against the entire world. but as soon as someone sues a LEO for valid reasoning, we are considered “toxic” towards the LEO community because “we are try to get them fired, wasting month of work”

[SerZhukov]

Realistically it should be by a preponderance, but that would make ‘ruining careers’ much easier. Just my two-sense.

[iLordOfAviation]

@Cuxle

but also what I notice is that when a criminal gets prosecuted & get (previously 72 hours) LEOs celebrate and act like they’ve committed irl crimes against the entire world

this is why i have always supported bringing the max sentence down to like 2 hours
and have never submitted anything to the DOJ bc of the outrageous jail times that brings
very stupid

[Authorized_People]

facts his name sounds hella dirty

[thekerbal]

don’t worry, I’m going to throw these new civil cases out to arbitration if it continues at this pace

[SerZhukov]

Caught in Prominence (@Jefrafra)

[RodrikSousa]

Not my fault that I got arrested for saying a joke, but ok…

[AngeIicAxis]

ok rodrik

[SmartFridge17]

I don’t seem to see the issue

@MichaeICalabrese

Edit: They should be required to have better evidence than 20 Seconds before the incident cause something else could’ve happened before and we wouldn’t know

Evidence is a requirement but whether its a 20 second video or a picture does it matter?

[MichaeICalabrese]

They need to be required to show what happened before said event happened, they could make it look like a false arrest due to we don’t know what they did before that

[ThinBlueBilly]

Look at my case that I have against me and look at the evidence SMH

[SerZhukov]

That’d be considered a legal defense, and considering that FS requires evidence beyond a reasonable doubt for finding someone guilty of a civil case, it won’t be considered false.