Can you not lower the amount of signatures required to be a potential candidate? Unless that isn’t the main problem.
4 Likes
i think the main problem is the willingness of people to run in the first place
5 Likes
yeah cause congress got a rep for being kinda toxic
4 Likes
its cus we’re kinda toxic
7 Likes
toxicity!
4 Likes
Oh fair enough then I mean is there really any incentive apart from being a member
4 Likes
Personally, I think you should lower the requirements just a small bit, giving people more opportunity to run or something. You could also increase the time y’all keep it open just a bit longer. I’ll personally run for a chamber but I just don’t have as much experience as some people may so that’s why I’m holding back.
4 Likes
yes… you get executive protection first hand access… and some perks
2 Likes
joshernaut: hold my beer
7 Likes
this post aged well.
6 Likes
REALLY THI LMAO
4 Likes
Ah fair enough then, honestly it’s just up to convincing people of the benefits then because it seems like not enough people want to actively partake
5 Likes
i do like STV tbf, very good system of voting
6 Likes
doesnt work on the forums though unless you do like runoffs
5 Likes
If you’re on about the formatting of the forum elections, you might find it easier to have first, second, third and fourth vote categories each containing another poll. If I’m mistaken please educate me, my good man.
3 Likes
I think we should keep it how it is right now with the staggered elections and see if that smooths out some of the issues with incompetence
3 Likes
yes but how would u do that on forums
3 Likes
If theres not enough people running I think theres a pretty easy solution… lower the seats or publicize more…
3 Likes