Criminal Alt Discussion

Firestone Discussion
, ,
46

Agree, the problem sometimes when you try to RP is that they don’t RP, you have 20 idiots ramming you or attacking you. But when there is actual RP like the one you mentioned is super fun. Maybe if they created a team that basically went in V2 to create RP sceneratios would be great.

2 Likes
47

As this topic has deviated to rants about trigger happy CFLs, I’ll get it back on course with a poll:

Should “legals” be allowed a criminal alt in Firestone?

  • Yes, except those in agencies that handle classification
  • Yes, including those in agencies that handle classification
  • No, keep it how it is

0 voters

5 Likes
48

now most cfls wont shoot anyone for any reason humanly possible

1 Like
49

Makes sense.

1 Like
50

Because with 16 votes so far, 69%(nice) of people seem to only want it for agencies that don’t handle classification. This is somewhat unnecessary, as it really won’t give any advantages or disadvantages to either side. I once again believe that the law should just be removed, as that’s the only thing to my knowledge preventing this from happening. At the end of the day, this is a game, so why not let people do as they please?

1 Like
51

can you link me it @jt7122

1 Like
52

i think someone in congress is going to repeal it or rewrite it due to its poor quality

2 Likes
53

yeah that is a really shitty law

if i am voted in senate i’ll get it rewritten or repealed

1 Like
54

I believe every LEO should be allowed to have a registered criminal ALT as long as they do not commit any crimes such as terror, organized crime, or other major crimes

1 Like
55

so like… you can’t do… any of the fun ones?

organised crime makes sense - especially in depts that deal with Classified InforMation - but terror is literally just killing a GO

2 Likes
56

well i mean terror sure but organized crime is a nono

1 Like
57

I still personally believe anyone should be able to use an alt to commit crime in v2, regardless of what agency/department they’re in

I don’t think it’ll benefit them in any way tbh, what could they do with such information that they have

3 Likes
58

I agree, the only thing that could be deemed sensitive is joining a voice chat regarding capturing a criminal, while acting criminal. Voice chats would be the only thing that could be abused since it’s real time talk.

5 Likes
59

I agree, I do not see information being at any higher risk of leakage than it already is just because someone is committing crimes on another account.

2 Likes
60

potentially tactics?? but the main advantage is more the equipment (such as an automatic rifle that kills in 4 shots) more than tactics

1 Like
61

question…

is allowing criminal alts up to congress or fedoramasterb98

2 Likes
62

moderation wise it is allowed, departments can terminate ppl for it since they “committed a crime” attaching it to the main acc (causing a blacklist/post revoke, etc etc)

2 Likes
63

even still doesn’t fed get a say?

1 Like
64

iirc there is no founder rule on (EDIT: CRIMINAL) alts

2 Likes
65

other then logical things such as bypassing a ban being prohibited

3 Likes