Alright then - if people are concerned about it (so that we don’t have issues) then set a vague limit that someone may be detained for a reasonable amount of time so that whatever criminal activities they did may be investigated but that once the investigation has concluded in the eyes of a reasonable person that the punishment defined by law may begin.
What do you think of something (with a little bit better grammar) like this?
May be to vague but the idea is to reach an equilibrium so that we can be able to handle crazy situations that go over the hard rule yet prevent this abuse that you allege.
The problem is that’s kinda too vague. Ideally, I don’t figure a person should be held longer than the max arrest time in game unless being actively interviewed, transported, etc. It shouldn’t take more than 15 minutes to determine if someone committed a crime should you not need an interview.
As a former councilman of the county. The county could use some things to do, with new councilman, I say we let the county make a law. Since SCSO is pretty much the problem for everything—detainment times, undercharging, etc. This law could only be mandated by use of SCSO and it could be a trial run, or a thing that only SCSO need. (No shade to SCSO, they do have some chads. But kinda only needed for them)
Precisely - a hard and fast rule is detrimental. Heck I don’t look at my clock sometimes during a shootout and if I go 1 millisecond over the limit then I would have committed a false arrest: bye bye everything.
Note: we are NOT Mayflower (we have a different climate, culture, values, ideologies, etc.). What works in Mayflower doesn’t always work everywhere else.