Brandishing a Firearm needs to be revised

[Gamer_Kyle]

@Fairfull

the only thing typical about this is you being a fucking dumbass.

Not even worth a reply, you are so childish it’s pathetic. I guess that’s what happens when you join a ROBLOX community, most people are 8-13, Maybe I should go to a GTA rp server, so young bruh

[Fairfull]

The fact you assume I’m within the ages of 8-13 is in it of itself ignorant and not worth a reply.

Sometimes truth hurts.

[Cuxle]

@Gamer_Kyle

But yeah they did have the right to tase me etc, no complaints their, thanks for not being toxic though, rare now days.

I see nobody being toxic but spitting fax here.

Title says: BRANDISHING A FIREARM NEEDS TO BE REVISED when there is no brandishing, and there is a threat present on the scene.

I have no idea where and how you think it needs to be revised, although CFL’s are annoying when it comes to interfering (in which congress should maybe do something about CFL warriors )

[Fairfull]

I second that CFLs can be quite annoying with their guns, absolutely.

[RestInPotatoes]

Don’t try and put words into my mouth by saying I said we point guns at you whenever we want. I said we have our guns out, pointing down, as a precautionary measure; especially around more dangerous individuals. It’s not because we feel like waving a gun around in your face.

[Gamer_Kyle]

It was a question, never claimed you said anything, you assumed I was a ‘new’ member. And my point still stands, that should be illegal.

[Gamer_Kyle]

I said most players within the ROBLOX community are between said age, never specified you’re age. I only stated you are immature, and act between those ages.

You can’t make any argument or have a civil debate, I’m simply asking a question about the law, and recommending it be revised, and you are being toxic.

@Fairfull

Sometimes truth hurts.

What truth?

[Gamer_Kyle]

@Cuxle

I see nobody being toxic but spitting fax here.

@SirKevinVonNedoh

how about you get your head out of your ass and stop baiting cops/guards into doing stuff just to report them

@Fairfull

I second this. You do this so much. That clip you provided proves our point.

@CanineEnforcement

, fuck outta here. it doesn’t need revision, just stop doing dumb shit to get drawn on.

@Fairfull

the only thing typical about this is you being a fucking dumbass.

And those are ‘facts’, you are either ignorant, or you do not know what facts mean.

@Cuxle

Title says: BRANDISHING A FIREARM NEEDS TO BE REVISED when there is no brandishing, and there is a threat present on the scene.

What?

@Cuxle

I have no idea where and how you think it needs to be revised, although CFL’s are annoying when it comes to interfering (in which congress should maybe do something about CFL warriors )

CFL’s cases of them interfering is rare. They are not a problem, a bigger problem is this law, I guess you just want a pat on the back from the leo community? Hm.

[cirt31]

I encourage Mr. Gamer to go and read the firearm act. On duty law enforcement at excused from brandishing. The fng is defined as a law enforcement agency by state law. This isn’t a matter or brandishing.

[Gamer_Kyle]

A moderator can feel free to lock this, congress will see this, clearly most of the community can’t have a civil debate.

[Gamer_Kyle]

That’s the issue, law enforcement should NOT be excused, that is why I said it needs to be revised. I am aware as of now, they are doing nothing wrong. I would like a link to the firearm act though.

[cirt31]

The reason they are exempted is because the entire definition of brandishing a firearm, is the reason they are probably going to use a gun. The definition says “threaten or intimidate another person.” When an officer uses their weapon it is to stop another person from shooting, hitting someone with a crowbar, or hitting someone with a car.

[Gamer_Kyle]

Fair point, but I think it should still be revised. Should be on duty law enforcement are excluded when; defending themselves or another person(s). Or something of that nature because again, an officer could point a gun at you at a breakfast table and that would be perfectly legal. that is not ok.

Back in my day, IO agent Jish and a female agent used to stick a gun in my mouth while questioning me. nothing was illegal about it. I don’t think that’s right.

[RestInPotatoes]

You should really think about how your entire argument translates into the real world. You are saying you want it to be illegal for law enforcement/military personnel to hold their gun in any form whatsoever, such as this.

I’ve never spoken to someone who wants military personnel to not hold a gun when they are standing guard at a military base, it just doesn’t make sense does it?

[Gamer_Kyle]

Wrong. The military has their own base, they own it. That’s like saying a home owner can’t open carry. on their property, they can do whatever they wish to as long as it isn’t hurting anyone.

I’m saying don’t point their gun at a citizen at a checkpoint.

[RestInPotatoes]

Yeah that’s right, we own the base so we can determine if you are a threat or not. You were, don’t deny it.

[Gamer_Kyle]

At the time, I was not. They had no reason to suspect so. And it is perfectly fine to determine if someone is a threat or not, but pointing a gun at them is not appropriate. Open carrying? sure.

[RestInPotatoes]

@Gamer_Kyle

And it is perfectly fine to determine if someone is a threat or not, but pointing a gun at them is not appropriate.

So you pretty much just said that if we determine you as a threat we can’t aim our guns at you? Makes full sense. If I deem you a threat to myself, and my colleagues safety then of course I’m gonna pull my gun out to protect everyone from you since when a person drives up to the checkpoint at FNG in V2, 99% of the time they never have good intentions and they either tend up trying to breach, ramming into us or shooting up the place.

[t1dtony]

@Gamer_Kyle

you’re power is being threatened.

you are power is being threatened

[CanineEnforcement]

@Gamer_Kyle

And yes, I did NOT expect to get drawn on, sure, my approach was aggressive, and I was yelling, but at that time, I was not really a threat. here is more of that clip

LMAO, are you fucking lost. you complain about them drawing on you, and then you openly admit to being aggressive and hostile. they’re allowed to draw on you when you’re clearly presenting yourself as hostile. and to top it off, you’re on their property. if they want to draw on you on their property that you entered on your own accord, that’s on you.