so this is what i’ve been faced with trying to minimize the outrageous 72 hour maximum jail time for crimes (amendment here lmao) and yes it benefits criminals, but i have a purpose to the amendment.
there are 2 reasons why i did this. this forum will explain my standpoint.
-
1: Gameplay.
- There’s a cycle of gameplay in Firestone, cops and criminals, all that jazz. I’ve seen both sides, I became knowledgeable in criminal mindsets, bonding with criminals over the course of the last few years of my time here. I’m a 2x former FSP Major. I’ve been through a year and a half with the Firestone State Patrol, and I know how criminals work, and how the law enforcement officers work against these criminals. I’ve spoken with multiple individuals on how people have fun here, and its because of combating crime, and how people do things that are hilariously ridiculous. Having a 72 hour maximum time limit for criminal charges limits that. In the event that you basically charge every criminal with a 72 hour sentence, you will see less enthusiasm on patrolling, which means less continual players, which evolves into inactivity, and then a domino effect where the game isn’t just fun anymore. The only hook on this game is the criminal standpoint, and thats how LEOs work and achieve enjoyment.
-
2: Morality.
- Again, we move back to the point that this is a game. You can’t expect the majority of criminals (of which are aged around the 13-17 age medium), to spend hours to AFK at a prison. It’s idiotic and it thwarts people away. This is how the cycle of gameplay gets broken, as stated above. It’s simply not even appropriate to have 3 day prison sentence where you have to be in game for all of those 3 days. People come home from six to seven hours of hard education to play this game. Some are criminals, some are officers. Having a 72 hour prison time limits them from relieving the stress that they may as well get from their actual lives.
response to the criticism / other contradicting points
following images are just the attorney general trying to disrupt my standpoint. i’ve responded to these personally, but i’d like to have a quick turn back to it and respond again, since now that i’m focused on making this.
yes, that’s the point of prison. however, 3 days of straight prison is unnecessary. sure, murdering people is breaking the law, but you respawn and literally regain the exact same life you had before you were murdered. i’m not saying that its okay to be murdered, or to murder, i still offer 24 hours as a maximum capacity, just not as long as 3 fucking days, because that’s simply unnecessary.
you’re the attorney general, a very high position of which requires you to not have a single molecule of crime in your body. however, i’ve seen criminals suffer through the process of a 3 day criminal sentence, when you haven’t, at all. you can’t easily do a 72 hour sentence in a week, even if you’re hardcore AFKing. it’s impossible.
lol
some people might reply saying “yo wasn’t your campaign a joke?”
i’d like to say yes, that it was a joke and i didn’t expect to get this far; but since i’m in it now, i’m fighting for the rights of equality.
i hope you lads understand that this was proposed before and that it was 10 hours instead of 24.
i made it 24 because i still believe that shit can be strict, just not as strict as 3 days. i believe that public safety is still a priority, and it always will be in my agenda.
thank you for listening to my tedtalk
