BE IT ENACTED BY THE STATE OF FIRESTONE LEGISLATURE THAT
PREAMBLE: As it currently stands the FFC only has the ability to suspend a CFL for a week. For some violations of the UCFA this is nothing but a slap on the wrist for them. They also hold the power to repeatedly suspend a license with no restriction. This bill allows them to suspend longer for more serious infractions that don’t necessarily incite revocation of a CFL but also places a limitation on the FFC’s ability to suspend CFL holders once per infraction. This bill also changes the way court ordered revocations work. Now instead of ordering the direct revocation of a CFL this makes it so the courts will send the court order to the FFC.
SECTION A: The “UCFA” shall be defined as: https://forums.stateoffirestone.com/t/the-uniformed-control-of-firearms-act/7151
SECTION B: Chapter 1, Section 4 of the UCFA currently states, “The FFC may, by ½ vote in affirmation, suspend a CFL with reason plausible to be detailed on the individual’s license card. This suspension may not exceed one week (seven days) in time. The judge appointed may overrule this with reason plausible. Another judge, through a hearing requested by the suspended individual, may overrule this suspension.”
SECTION B.1: Chapter 1, Section 4 of the UCFA shall be amended to state, “The FFC may, by ½ vote in affirmation, suspend a CFL with reason plausible to be detailed on the individual’s license card. This suspension may not exceed one month (thirty days) in time. The judge appointed may overrule this with reason plausible. Another judge, through a hearing requested by the suspended individual, may overrule this suspension. Once suspended, a CFL license holder may not be suspended again for the same incident.”
SECTION C: Chapter 1, Section 5 of the UCFA currently states, “As punishment for conviction of any crime in a court of law, a judge may suspend a CFL for a period not exceeding two weeks (fourteen days). Appealing this must be done through the normal appeals process.”
SECTION C.1: Chapter 1, Section 5 of the UCFA shall be amended to state, “As punishment for conviction of any crime in a court of law, a judge may order the FFC to suspend a CFL for a period not exceeding one month (thirty days). Appealing this must be done through the normal court appeals process.”
SECTION D: Chapter 1, Section 6 of the UCFA currently states, “The FFC may, by ⅔ vote in affirmation, revoke a CFL with reason plausible. This revocation shall also serve as a blacklist from further receiving a CFL in the future. This may be overturned by ½ vote of the commission at any time. A judge may overrule this upon the findings of a hearing requested by the individual.”
SECTION D.1: Chapter 1, Section 6 of the UCFA shall be amended to state, “The FFC may, by ⅔ vote in affirmation, revoke a CFL with reason plausible. A judge may overrule this upon the findings of a hearing requested by the individual. The FFC may also, by ⅔ vote in affirmation, blacklist a citizen from receiving a CFL. This may be overturned by ½ vote of the commission at any time. A judge may overrule this upon the findings of a hearing requested by the individual.”
SECTION E: Chapter 1, Section 7 of the UCFA currently states, “As punishment for conviction of any felony in a court of law, a judge may revoke a CFL. The FFC cannot overrule this. This ruling shall be subject to the normal appeals process.”
SECTION E.1: Chapter 1, Section 7 of the UCFA shall be amended to state, “As punishment for conviction of any felony in a court of law, a judge may order the FFC to revoke a CFL. The FFC cannot overrule this order.”
SECTION F: This legislation shall go into effect immediately after completing the constitutional procedures.
Chief Sponsor(s):
Senator and FFC Member dosk2
Co-Sponsor(s):
Attorney General and FFC Chairman, UprisingAmerican
Senator and FFC, Member Kat4Katrina
Representative, ShutUpDying
Senator JohnDRyans