THE FCC CONTINUITY ACT

Legislature State Legislature
1

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

August 23, 2024

THE FCC CONTINUITY ACT

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the State of Firestone in Congress assembled,

§1. TITLE

  1. This act shall be known, and may be cited as “THE FCC CONTINUITY ACT ”.

§2. DEFINITIONS

  1. The Firestone Criminal Code (FCC) shall be referred to here.

§3. AMENDMENTS TO CRIMINAL CODE

  1. FCC §1(7) “Identification Presentation” shall be renamed to “Failure to Identify”.

  2. FCC §3(3) “Destroying Property” shall be renamed to “Destruction of Property”.

  3. FCC §3(4) “Destroying Government Property” shall be renamed to “Destruction of Government Property”.

  4. FCC 4(24) “Possessing or Using Breaching Tools” shall be renamed to “Unlawful Possession or Use of Breaching Tools”.

  5. FCC §6(24) “Impediment of Accountability and Civil Rights Enforcement” shall be renamed to “Obstruction of Civil Rights Enforcement”.

  6. FCC §6(24a) currently states, “Impediment of Accountability and Civil Rights Enforcement shall be a criminal offense in the State of Firestone.”

  7. FCC §6(24a) shall be amended to state, “Obstruction of Civil Rights Enforcement shall be a criminal offense in the State of Firestone.”

  8. FCC §6(24b) currently states, “Impediment of Accountability and Civil Rights Enforcement shall be defined as "willfully obstructing, hindering, or interfering with the lawful authority of civil rights and accountability agents/officers of the Department of Justice; willfully obstructing, hindering, or interfering with the investigation of any crime or prohibited act under the Civil Rights and Public Integrity Act; willfully and knowingly attempting to or succeeding in the obfuscation or cover up of any criminal offense or prohibited act under the Civil Rights and Public Integrity Act; or willfully failing to comply with a compliance directive issued under the authority of a state court.”

  9. FCC §5(24b) shall be amended to state, “Obstruction of Civil Rights Enforcement shall be defined as "willfully obstructing, hindering, or interfering with the lawful authority of civil rights and accountability agents/officers of the Department of Justice; willfully obstructing, hindering, or interfering with the investigation of any crime or prohibited act under the Civil Rights and Public Integrity Act; willfully and knowingly attempting to or succeeding in the obfuscation or cover up of any criminal offense or prohibited act under the Civil Rights and Public Integrity Act; or willfully failing to comply with a compliance directive issued under the authority of a state court.

  10. FCC §6(5) “Evidence” shall be renamed to “Evidence Tampering”.

  11. FCC 8(4) “Contempt of County Council” currently states, “Contempt of County Council shall be recognized as an unlawful criminal offense within Stapleton County. Contempt of County Council shall be the act of obstructing the proceedings of the Stapleton County Council as laid out by the floor rules legislation or rules. This shall include disrupting council proceedings or lawful inquiries by the County Council.”

  12. FCC 8(4) “Contempt of County Council” shall be amended to state, “Contempt of County Council shall be recognized as an unlawful criminal offense within Stapleton County. Contempt of County Council shall be the act of obstructing the proceedings of the Stapleton County Council as laid out by the floor rules legislation or rules.”

  13. FCC §9(Section1) “Contempt of Prominence Council” shall be renamed to, “Contempt of the Prominence District Council”

  14. FCC §9(Section1) currently states, “Contempt of Prominence Council shall be the act of obstructing or disturbing or hindering the proceedings of the Prominence District Council as laid out in the District Charter, floor rules or other applicable procedural legislation or rules. Failure to abide by a lawful inquiry shall also constitute Contempt of Prominence Council.”

  15. FCC §9(Section1) shall be amended to state, “Contempt of the Prominence District Council shall be the act of obstructing, disturbing or hindering the proceedings of the Prominence District Council as laid out in the District Charter, floor rules or other applicable procedural legislation or rules. Failure to abide by a lawful inquiry shall also constitute Contempt of the Prominence District Council.”

  16. FCC §10(1) “Contempt of the Council” shall be renamed to, “ Contempt of the Redwood City Council”

  17. FCC §10(1a) currently states, “Contempt of the Council shall be recognized as an unlawful criminal offense in the City of Redwood.

  18. FCC §10(1a) shall be amended to state, “Contempt of the Redwood City Council shall be recognized as an unlawful criminal offense within the City of Redwood.”

  19. FCC §10(1b) currently states, “Contempt of the Council shall be defined as the act of obstructing the proceedings of the Redwood City Council as defined by their floor rules or other applicable procedural legislation or rules. Failure to abide by a lawful inquiry of the Council shall also constitute Contempt of the Council. Before a witness of a council inquiry may be convicted of this crime, it must be established that the matter of the inquiry is a subject that the Redwood City Council has the legal ability to legislate.”

  20. FCC §10(1b) shall be amended to state, “Contempt of the Redwood City Council shall be defined as the act of obstructing the lawful proceedings of the Redwood City Council as defined by their floor rules or other applicable procedural legislation or rules. Failure to abide by a lawful inquiry of the Council shall also constitute Contempt of the Council.”

  21. FCC §11(1) “Contempt of the Council” shall be renamed to, “Contempt of the Arborfield City Council”

  22. FCC §11(1a) currently states, “Contempt of the Council shall be recognized as an unlawful criminal offense in the City of Arborfield.”

  23. FCC §11(1a) shall be amended to state, “Contempt of the Arborfield City Council shall be recognized as an unlawful criminal offense within the City of Arborfield.”

  24. FCC §11(1b) currently states, “The act of impeding the proceedings of the City Legislature or obstructing a committee inquiry, provided that said committee is duly recognized in accordance with the law, shall be deemed as Contempt of the Council of Arborfield. Any individual who, when summoned before the Council, knowingly and intentionally fails to fulfill their obligations or who, having duly presented themselves, declines to respond to any relevant inquiry on the matter under investigation shall be deemed to have committed this offense.”

  25. FCC §11(1b) shall be amended to state, “The act of impeding the proceedings of the Arborfield City Council or obstructing a committee inquiry, provided that said committee is duly recognized in accordance with the law, shall be deemed as Contempt of the Arborfield City Council. Any individual who, when summoned before the Council, knowingly and intentionally fails to fulfill their obligations or who, having duly presented themselves, declines to respond to any relevant inquiry on the matter under investigation shall be deemed to have committed this offense.”

  26. FCC §11(1c) shall be removed in its entirety.

  27. FCC §11(1d) shall be removed in its entirety.

§7. ENFORCEMENT

  1. This Act shall be enforced by all relevant parties.

§8. SEVERABILITY

  1. Should any part of this act be struck down and/or declared unenforceable, the rest of the act will remain in effect unless also struck down and/or declared unenforceable.

Chief Sponsor(s):

Representative StealthSniper292

2

This topic was automatically closed after 1 minute. New replies are no longer allowed.