no, the issue here was that there was no alternative entity to ensure the provision of electricity continued, which could have been resolved by:
a) a competitive electrical energy company
b) a backup plan with alternative energy companies or a state-level entity that could take-over the means of electrical energy production as necessary
c) a seizure of SGP assets in order to ensure and continue the effective provision of electricity, overseen by Commerce or another state-level entity
SGP was failing, any competent person could deduce that, and Commerce did the right thing