“GIMMIE 50 JJ’S NOW!!” - It’s the stereotypical line you’d hear when speaking about FNG basic training. However, it isn’t just the armed forces of Firestone anymore with requirements to dwindle your fingers away; departments, such as FSP, are implementing the use of physical training (PT) as punishments (and presumably other things of the sort). This raises a debate; should PT be allowed?
Let’s bring the story back on my end to July 2018. I’d just gone through POST, and sure, there was emotional stress provided by the instructors, but PT wasn’t a factor; it’s usage was ultimately frowned upon due to it’s argument in futility. That was Class 34, and throughout my LEO career, I’ve never encountered PT, and I’ve performed just fine without it.
Now sure, one may say “Oh, but PT is used a punishment for trainees and employees who aren’t performing a task correctly, and keeps them in shape disciplinary wise.” However I’d disagree; once again, I’ve gone many, many months without PT, and discipline levels haven’t change much at all since it’s implementation. PT overall is just a waste of time that could be used for productive things; your ROBLOX character can’t get physically stronger, and it just dwindles away at your fingers, attempting to type how many JJ’s you’ve done or how many laps you’ve run.
Overall, I disagree with the fundamental concepts of PT; we should be encouraging building to ensure the best employees we can, and not forcing courses upon people of which are futile and could be used as a better resource of learning.
FNG is excluded I guess
(sorry for the bad formatting and possible grammar errors, this was written late-ish at night)
leave what you think below