You’re sitting in a court case enjoying the defense scream objection to an opening statement then, ZAP! You’re tazed with a gear that has terrible aim and is targeting a loud mouth audience member who says he has a gun. In most court cases I have seen this is the situation that occurs. The gear is incredibly unconventional and useless. I recommend baliff’s be given a less destructive tool or they use admin to deal with these disturbances.
Signed,
Glorious_Founder
0 voters
how about you just not go to these cases
There are no objections in opening statements.
They still scream it
Not in my damn courtroom they dont
“Never underestimate the power of stupid people in a large group.” -George Carlin
i was tempted to in the celastrino case only because there was even more bia in the jury after i got kicke dout
As a new balliff I can tell you that the rules state your not allowed to use the Tazer unless in a srs situation
lol I’m currently in judge training and the first thing I’m told is that there are no objections during opening statements lmaoo
You’re right! Why use the taser when I can just run :ban commands! I’d say I spend a solid 5-10 minutes of my trials just throwing out bans. It’s great, really pisses people off.
that’s what I was gonna say danny!
As I’ve noticed
I would prefer them being banned over the entire court case turning into a shitshow with discharged tasers and beatings going on in the seat next to me.