Judges preside over cases, what do you mean they investigate?
The entire hearing for CanineEnforcement will be public. We will also have scribes there to legally record it. Once everything is concluded, either me or one of the scribes will release a document stating every detail. That is how it has been with every case and how it will be.
Presiding over cases is essentially equivalent to reviewing evidence brought to them and creating an effect from the situation (verdict). This is essentially investigating evidence brought to them. CGOC has a similar purpose in my belief, although they can hunt for the evidence.
Unless you can point out a specific situation in which the CGOC has been biased, I don’t see any base for that statement other than your simple assumption.
By that logic, the House wouldn’t be able to bring up impeachment charges & the Senate wouldn’t be able to hold trials just because it is “GOs impeaching GOs.” That makes no sense.
We give those being investigated fair opportunity to defend themselves. We only present factual evidence, and our only power at the end of the day is to recommend impeachment. I can assure you there is no secret bias brewing in the CGOC.
SPT Skye Jones
princess skye!!#9640
if I want to make a statement, believe me I will, I only talk off of what I see
And how is IO any different lol
I didn’t mention IO or that they are different, but with CGOC’s “We need to classify everything, we are soooo important” how are they different? Oh well, IO classifies things that are a threat to state security, CGOC classifies everything cause they think it’s that serious
We classify every investigation, not everything.
You might say that “oh its an investigation, we find out what the crimes will be” but you have to realize; when an investigation is open you are accusing them of committing some crime or violation.
This is a witch hunt, just like the whole Russia collusion bullshit
Trump: “What are you after me for?”
Dems: “IDK ANYTHING WE CAN FIND TO IMPEACH YOU”
I apologize, but I can affirm everyone that this is not a witch hunt.
Wrong, an investigation doesn’t accuse anyone of anything. It is to find out more on the topic.
That is just what the Dems say.
And what can you base that our investigation is a witch hunt? You don’t know what we have found or what we have not?
The fact that you openly stated you didn’t know what he was being accused of.
You do classify everything, and the Governor has a point in a statement he made; you have no oversight, you can say the committee can overrule the chair, but you need an outside source to provide insight, that’s why public trust is low in ya’ll
The majority of CGOC’s power was proposed by James and voted on by the rest of Congress. CGOC has no oversight and it seems dumb easy for them to gain even more power and have absolute control over how they operate. They take complaints in from left to right and it lands them into negative publicity.
As Ftlicious said, all you are trying to do James is increase your political power.
CGOC gives itself power, nobody oversees CGOC, it’s a bomb that can go off, it may not be under James, but when his office vacated, another chair can be responsible for that bomb going off
Congress oversees CGOC lol hence it being a committee.
I apologize again, but I stated “idk” as a mere joke, then almost immediately afterwards, as I said like 5 minutes ago, I explained to Canine in his DMs.