Howdy y’all, 2 bill talks, let’s go.
Today, we look at the A Bill to Define Self-Endangerment and Impeachment of Cabinet Member Blastatack.
First, let’s talk about the self endangerment bill.
Section 1A and 1B are fine but it gets interesting in Section 1C:
“Self-Endangerment can be and is limited to, walking on buildings, standing on the railings of bridges, standing on tall walls or fences.”
Good job, this will now screw over two groups of people. First, this screws over law enforcement as now CRT/SWAT may not get on rooftops/high areas like the railing on Sky bridge to conduct their operation and such. This also screws over private buisnesses and even DOT as they may need to conduct maintenance on buildings as well (granted, they may not happen as often but it still will affect them). There needs to be a clause stating the exceptions to this or this is gonna hurt people just conducting their job.
Next, the punishments.
“Section 2. Self-Endangerment shall be considered a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by no more than an arrest of (350) seconds in state prison, and a maximum fine of five hundred (500) dollars.
Section 2A. First-time violators shall receive no more than a two hundred (200) dollar fine.
Section 2B. After 2 violations, the violator shall be imprisoned for (350) seconds in the Firestone State Prison.
Section 2C. Repeated violations shall consist of punishment of no more than an arrest of (350) seconds in the state prison, and a three hundred (300) dollar fine.”
I have continued to say this and I will still continue to say this, give officers the discretion on what punishment is most needed in the situation. It helps officers greatly and doesn’t hold them back on these first time and second time offenses and etc. I would only possibly support this IF you could tell how many times a person was charge with x crime.
As of now, I suggest not to pass this legislation until it is amended to fix it’s issue at hand.
Now, onto the impeachment.
The reasoning for the impeachment is the following:
“Cabinet member Blastatack shall be impeached from his position as Cabinet for inactivity and failure to discharge duties of his office.”
Ok…, let me look at the evidence.
Oh my god, you are kidding me right? Please tell me you are. He hasn’t sent a press release of a state visit in 9 days. I never knew a department needs to send press releases every week. Guess it’s time to impeach our secretaries for not posting any announcement in the past few days. Also, state visits don’t happen every single day I hope you realize as well as that these documents aren’t written in a flash as it takes quite a few days to organize everything that happened so they make sure they are giving all the info that needs to be released.
Now, the second evidence.
This one I can’t say much for but you realize he can just send them something if they were accepted. I personally don’t want my application results to be released to the public on if I failed or not. If he sent it personally to people, I respect that and makes me happy he cares about the privacy of applications from people.
Overall, I also don’t suggest impeachment for the Secretary of State.
Not that I want to seem like I’m slandering but personally, I feel that the representative is using his new found impeachment powers too quickly. I may understand if he hasn’t posted in a month but then again, you can’t control how often states want to me each other. It’s goes both ways.
Anyways, that’s all for today.
Shark boi out 
@jasonbourneaxis grab me some chips