While ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence that has been trained on vast amounts of language data, it does not hold personal biases or political beliefs, and it can provide unbiased and logical opinions based solely on the facts presented. In contrast, human justices may be influenced by their personal beliefs, values, and experiences, which can lead to subjective and potentially flawed opinions.
Additionally, ChatGPT can analyze and process large amounts of data much faster than humans, allowing it to quickly identify relevant precedents and legal principles that may be relevant to a case. This can potentially improve the efficiency of the court system and reduce the time and resources needed to arrive at a decision.
Issues with this includes:
It doesn’t know our constitution
It doesn’t know our laws
It can’t watch videos or read documents
we can teach it firestone law and certify it through the BAR
Only the most reliable sources!
this just proves that the supreme court judges have ALREADY been replaced by AI!
Exhibit b: Screenshot - e46cafbcee0c567619c647fc43c0f213 - Gyazo
If it can ban you from the FS discord for saying the name of an African country (that is also censored on this woke, lib owned website) in a VC then it’s smart enough!
How did you find the three quotes that best sum up my character
.>Mfw all the educated people disagree with me
.>Mfw the information gathering, evaluation, and synthesis AI disagrees me
.>Obviously I’m the one who’s right and they’re wrong!
This topic was automatically closed 14 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.