While ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence that has been trained on vast amounts of language data, it does not hold personal biases or political beliefs, and it can provide unbiased and logical opinions based solely on the facts presented. In contrast, human justices may be influenced by their personal beliefs, values, and experiences, which can lead to subjective and potentially flawed opinions.
Additionally, ChatGPT can analyze and process large amounts of data much faster than humans, allowing it to quickly identify relevant precedents and legal principles that may be relevant to a case. This can potentially improve the efficiency of the court system and reduce the time and resources needed to arrive at a decision.
If it can ban you from the FS discord for saying the name of an African country (that is also censored on this woke, lib owned website) in a VC then it’s smart enough!
Also:
.>Mfw all the educated people disagree with me
.>Mfw the information gathering, evaluation, and synthesis AI disagrees me
.>Obviously I’m the one who’s right and they’re wrong!
