General Rules of Procedure in the State Courts Revision Act Part 2

RULE 16 - Jury How Taken

a) The empaneled jury having completed voir dire shall be sequestered in the courtroom.

b) The presiding officer shall ensure that the jury is present for the entire trial.

c) If the number of jurors present drops below the lawfully permitted minimum, the trial shall immediately cease until such a time as the minimum is restored.

i) If the minimum does not return after a reasonable amount of time, the presiding judge shall declare a mistrial.

ii) No juror after leaving, should the trial continue in their absence, be allowed to continue to serve on the jury.

iii) No juror may be admitted on the jury mid-trial if they were not empanelled in accordance to rule 7.

d) The jury, after the closing statements have been presented and before the presentation of the

verdict, shall in a trial be given private place to meet.

i) Such a place shall be sealed to the outside except for individual employees of the court

authorized to enter.

ii) The jury shall deliberate and may reach a verdict of guilty if they find that the defendant, beyond a reasonable doubt, committed the alleged action.

iii) The jury shall not use “jury nullification”.

iv) Should the jury find that the defendant there is reasonable doubt that the defendant did not commit the offense, they shall find the defendant not guilty.

  1. All votes of the jury must be unanimous.

  2. The jury shall find the defendant guilty or not-guilty on each specific charge. Lesser included offenses cannot be used as an alternative verdict.

v) If a vote is not unanimous and remains hopelessly nonunanimous, the jury shall inform the presiding officer who shall declare a hung jury and a mistrial.

e) A juror may be removed mid-trial, and not readmitted to the jury in such a case, if it is found that the juror has:

i) A conflict of interest;

ii) accepted a bribe in the case;

iii) or other good cause.

f) If a juror is dismissed mid-trial by the judge and the number of jurors drops below the minimum lawful amount, clause c of this rule shall apply.

g) During deliberations, the jury may question the presiding officer. Such questions must be limited to only questions of law and not questions of fact.

h) After rendering the verdict to the judge, the jury is determined to be dissolved and the jurors

therefore dismissed.

i) After the closing statements but before the commencement of jury deliberation, the presiding justice shall inform the jury (where possible in plain English) of:

i) Legal definitions of all charges presented against the defendant;

ii) requirement for a unanimous agreement per charge;

iii) hung juries;

iv) conflicts of interests and bribes and consequences thereof;

v) mistrials and consequences thereof;

vi) the burden of proof necessary to convict the defendant;

vii) and any other matters of law the presiding justice may find to be of great pertinence.

j) The specific text stated in the jury instructions must be publicized to both parties once it is distributed to the jury. Both parties shall be permitted to motion to append or amend the jury instructions. Both parties are permitted to debut such motions. The presiding justice shall decide whether appending or amending the jury instructions is necessary to ensure all necessary probative information as per matters of law is distributed to the jury.

RULE 17 - Definitions

a) The word “justice”, “judge”, “judiciary”, or “judicial official” shall refer to any currently serving member of the Judicial Branch authorized to hear any suit or complaint within the state.

b) The words “presiding Officer”, “PO”, or “presiding justice” shall refer to the judge presiding over a case.

c) The words “civil matter”, “civil complaint”, or “civil suit” shall refer to any matter whereby the charge does not result in the defendant being incarcerated in the State Penitentiary should the accused be convicted, unless otherwise prescribed by law in civil or tort matters.

d) The words “criminal complaint” or “criminal case” shall refer to any matter whereby the charge could result in the defendant being incarcerated in the State Penitentiary should the accused be

convicted.

e) The words “unlawful purposes” shall refer to criminal threats or any other action

which is deemed unlawful.

f) The word “spam” shall refer to the repeated placing of text or images which is meant to destroy or hinder the operations of a certain thing or is irrelevant to the question at hand.

g) The word “complaint” shall refer to an accusation that a person or persons broke a law.

h) The words “plaintiff” and “prosecution” shall refer to a person or group allegeding

that another group or person broke a law.

i) The words “defense” and “defendant” shall refer to a group or person alleged to have

broken a law in a complaint.

j) The word “writ” shall refer to an order issued and granted by any court for a specific

type of relief.

k) The word “charges” shall refer to a list of alleged laws violated by the defendant.

l) The words “hearing” shall refer to a non-trial gathering of the relevant parties to argue

a motion or to tend to a matter in front of a judge.

m) The word “docket” shall refer to a group of complaints or petitions that will be, or are

going to be heard by a court or sole judge.

n) The words “opening statement” shall refer to the first statement in a trial summarizing the events in question, the evidence to be presented, and the applicable charge(s).

o) The words “physical evidence” shall refer to any evidence that is a: video, photograph, URL, website, program, code, etc. and is not a human testifying as to a certain topic.

p) The words “witness testimony” shall refer to any person answering questions under oath in a court of law.

q) The word “qualified attorney” shall refer to any person who is able to lawfully represent others in the court of law.

r) The term “guilty” shall refer to it being proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the ‘guilty’ person has committed the act with which they are accused.

s) The term “not guilty” shall refer to the failure to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the ‘not guilty’ person has committed the act with which they are accused.

t) The words “no contest” shall refer to not saying if someone committed an action accused of.

u) The words “trier of fact” shall refer to the party designated to determine the guilt of

the defendant.

v) The word “party” shall refer to a person(s) or entity named as the plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, or respondent in a matter.

w) The words “opening statement” shall refer to the first statement in a trial summarizing the events in question, the evidence to be presented, and the applicable charge(s).

x) The words “closing statement” shall refer to an ending statement by a party to summarize the important points that the party would like to point out to the trier of fact.

y) The words “Direct Examination” shall refer to the party who presented the witness questioning the witness for the first time.

z) The words “Cross Examination” shall refer to the party who did not present the witness questioning the witness for the first time.

aa) The words “Re-Direct Examination” shall refer to the party who called the witness questioning the witness for the second time.

bb) The words “Re-Cross Examination” shall refer to the party who did not call the witness questioning the witness for the second time.

cc) The word “recuse” shall refer to a judge refusing to rule on a matter or question and

that same judge refusing to place the original matter at hand on their docket.

dd) The words “jury nullification” shall refer to a jury finding a defendant not guilty

because they dislike or disagree with the way that the law was or is enforced with no real legal merit.

ee) The words “judicial examination” shall refer to the presiding officer questioning a witness.

ff) The words “voir dire” shall refer to the formal selection of the jury.

gg) The words “peremptory challenge” shall refer to a party being able to dismiss a juror(s) without having to give a reason.

hh) The words “victim impact statement” shall refer to the person(s) injured by the actions of a defendant being permitted to give their views about the defendant’s sentence.

ii) The word “stay” shall refer to a court halting the proceedings for a case in either that court or a court inferior to that court.

jj) The word “Amicus Curiae” shall refer to a person or entity who would be affected by a decision of a court or has some sort of insight or bearing on the case.

kk) The word “tangible” shall refer to anything that can be touched or viewed (such as videos, photographs, urls, etc.).

ll) The word “seal” shall refer to a court ordering the deletion of something from a person’s record. Any lawfully sealed record may not be used against the person in question in lawful proceedings or as otherwise determined by law.

mm) The words “admission of evidence” shall refer to the allowance of a piece of evidence to be used in a trial, hearing, or other judicial proceeding.

nn) The word “evidence” shall refer to something that can prove a point for a party in a

case.

oo) The term “criminal organization” shall refer to any group of three or more individuals who mutually agree to violate the law; specifically, but not necessarily, under the umbrella term “gang” or “mafia” or any other term which can reasonably be associated to criminal activities.

pp) The term “lay witness” shall refer to any witness who testifies as to their personal experience(s).

qq) The term “expert witness” shall refer to any witness who provides an opinion as to their specialized field of interest.

RULE 18 - Misc.

a) Before any judicial proceeding may occur, all of the parties involved shall be “sworn in” using the oath of honesty demanded by the perjury laws of the state. Swearing in of the parties shall not be mandatory for Supreme Court Special Proceedings as defined in Rule 10.

b) The following bills shall be considered null and void:

i) An Act to Establish General Rules of Procedure in the State Courts

ii) A Bill to Amend ‘An Act to Establish General Rules of Procedure in the State Courts’ (revised)

iii) A Bill to Further Amend An Act to Court Procedure

iv) An Amendment to An Act to Establish General Rules of Procedure in the State Courts

v) A Bill to Establish Fair Testimony in the State Courts

vi) An Amendment to the GRP (Revised)

vii) AN ACT to Establish More Realistic Motions

viii) An Amendment to the Motions Law to Enact a Fair Jurisprudence

ix) A Bill to Amend An Act to Establish More Realistic Motions

x) A Bill to Illegalize Violation of Judicial Ethics

Respectfully submitted to the Congress of the State of Firestone,

CHIEF SPONSORS:

Representative, NotoriousAmerican

Representative, SerZhukov

Director of the Public Defender’s Office, thekerbal

2 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 1 minute. New replies are no longer allowed.

1 Like