I suggest there be a system where FBI (and law enforcement as a whole) could obtain a user’s transaction history from the past 30 days. This could include vehicle purchases, money transfers, deposits, etc. The transaction history could be attainable through a special type of search warrant through the courts. This can be useful in many cases, but mainly to help provide evidence for corruption.
9 Likes
Transaction histories through a special search warrant could enhance law enforcement’s ability to uncover corruption and financial misconduct. It could provide crucial evidence, reveal hidden connections or illicit activities, and strengthen cases against individuals who might otherwise evade detection.
6 Likes
Support
1 Like
Support, great idea
1 Like
That’s pretty OP. If, by some miracle of Fed Almighty, this occurred, we’d have to make an adversarial hearing process for this.
No support from me
3 Likes
Not really? Even still, there’s literally no other way to prove a lot of financial related crimes without being able to get a warrant for bank records.
1 Like
cope?
No point in transaction history with V2’s limited economy
no support. I can see this being easily abused by FBI and DHS whom already abuse the assets and resources they have/have had access to
1 Like
Good idea for V3
1 Like
Yea it’s always FBI and DHS abusing assets at their disposal, and never municipal agencies which are beacons of good practice.
4 Likes
especially with upstanding employees like MattSixtyNin, who is famous for his public approval… he got 73% in his last poll!
3 Likes
i love this
but it would ruin my front for my money laundering business…the firestone laundromat
support
(this is a joke please spare me)
2 Likes
LMAOO
watch it forums is gonna be legally binding.
1 Like
It did
is that a new list of fedlaws because TECHNICALLY nobody announced it;
notes from a meeting =/= new rules
Counterpoint: I am head judge man and I personally witnessed it, and me and my homies decide what is admissible (legally there’s no impediment under current rules, it’s a Fed policy thing which as you see was clarified) so uhhhhh
1 Like