Just recently, former captain UprisingAmerican was demoted to fire medic for a topic that shouldn’t be revealed to the public. Do you think the demotion of UprisingAmerican is even beneficial to SCFD as a whole, and is even true? Yes, the former captain happened to be marked as “incompetent” but he was clearly set up. A recording of him during his test was sent to hicomm, and after just a few mistakes during the test he was demoted. Apparently nowadays a few mistakes is a complete fail. That doesn’t seem right in my opinion, and no where in the SOG’s does it say a member like him can be demoted from that. Even though he has to work on competency, he still has the skill of leadership within his positions.
If y’all support UprisingAmerican in getting promoted again, show it in the comments. I myself, Firefighter Allylovesdogs101, support him and I think all this was a complete false demotion.
Little command demotions are any beneficial to the department. Despite losing a valued member of our command, we cannot allow incompetence in such a scale from a member in that position. He was the Training Division Captain and failed to be any proficient in EMS, twice, showing that he was not competent for the spot. There’s a difference between losing someone in an important spot from losing someone competent in an important spot.
You might have posted the evidence now but certainly haven’t watched it as the time of TDS having updated the card with the evidence was, at the time of this post and you editting your message, less than 1 hour ago which means you can’t possibly have watched the video entirely yet.
I feel bad for uprising and the other person in the video. That’s an hour out of your lives that you will never get back. Congratulations on such a waste of time.
Night shift Chief Paramedic here.
From what I skimmed on x2 speed, there was very little specification, the testee didn’t know several required items of each field, including IV flow rates, medicines, and additionally left out portions of required treatments that would still render the patient unsuitable for transport.
Also, what you’ve just done is expose testing material to the public. Go team.
Say or believe what you want, but I’m going to go with HICOMM on this one. The audit tests were there for a reason, and they certainly seem to have done their job in this case.
