Cones

Before I start this, I’d just like to say. Don’t think this is just favouritism or something. As I’ve saw other people agree with me, and it’s serious. I like all the departments I mention here. And this is purely for realism.

So this is about cones. At the minute, LEOs get 5 cones. That’s quite reasonable and they should stay as they are, so this suggestion isn’t about LEO cones.

DPW. DPW had 5 I believe? Anyway, that’s against the point. The point is, they recently received 10. This is fine, as long as they are told more about when to use them. Otherwise, they should be reduced to what it was not long ago. Why? Because on numerous occasions, I’ve saw DPW just parked up in their sweeper or WM truck at a random scene, with cones out. Literally managing traffic, also with their traffic sign. Whether it’s an MVA scene (which is more reasonable for a sweeper and it can sweep the mess, but it wrong for a WM truck), or even just at an abandoned but fine car that is awaiting tow. Traffic control isn’t their job. It’s the job of DOT. DOT has SM F150s and arrow board trucks, which are purely for traffic management. DPW has a WM truck and a sweeper (and administrative Tahoe but that’s nothing to do with this), which are not made for traffic management. The cones should either be reduced, or they should be told how and when to use them. For example, when an MVA is Code 4, and they need to sweep a full lane. Today, I was on scene of an MVA as a LEO. I got there and an ambulance was there, along with a DPW sweeper. Cones were closing a whole lane, and there was nothing in or near the lane. I asked who closed it, and the DPW said there WAS (the key word) a fire truck there. Which is fine. But it wasn’t there then when I got there. And a lane was uneccessarily closed. It was on the E17 bridge. So it was actually more dangerous having the lane closed than not. As it’s a bit of a ramp and a bit of a blind dip. So it was closed for no reason, and it could have caused another accident. When the patient was transported to hospital, the DPW just left. Which means, they were only there for traffic management. Not even sweeping the scene.

DOT has had 10 cones for a while, and that’s how it should be. As DOT specialises in: towing and traffic management! If not 10, we should have maybe 15. I’ve saw many people say DOT should have more, as it is actually sometimes a struggle when a flipped car is blocking a whole lane and it needs cones: around the lane, at the end of your truck bed, at the car to flip it, and possibly another to pivot it.

Note: the main suggestion is the bit with the block quote. If you think I am just showing favouritism, I seriously am not. Be considerate and think about real life.

5 Likes

Orrrr…

Let I have suggested before, make it where anyone on a team can click a cone that is deployed to remove it. If DPW puts down cones and forgets about them then LEO’s or other departments should be able to just click on each cone and by doing so it removed the cone.

8 Likes

Supporto

3 Likes

tldr please

2 Likes

Limit cones for DPW since they don’t do traffic control.

That is the tl;dr and not my opinion. I am against this tbh.

4 Likes

but then again if you leave all the cones to FDOT then there might not be enough because there are not that many FDOT ever online and I actually think all government cars should have 20 cones.

2 Likes

But then that’s not realistic is it. Police don’t go round with 20 cones do they etc

2 Likes

ya your right it isnt

2 Likes

If anything there should be a bigger emphasis on “Cone etiquette” to ensure people actual remove them as they leave a scene, and if your quarrel lies with DPW then they should be especially enforcing this. However it should go to all departments that have cones, as well as flares.

Until V3 or a scripter comes to V2 development to fix tools, there could be an implemented system to remove the cones once the player leaves a certain range of them. But seeing as that’s extremely unlikely in V2, “Cone etiquette” will just have to be enforced.

2 Likes

Well, good idea but there’s plenty situations where this can be abused, I will list two.

  1. Department Employees get into a fight about where cones are placed, and just constantly deletes. (You cannot tell me this won’t happen)
  2. Rouges can go around and unblock or pick up the cones, when they are needed,

I KNOW IM LATE

3 Likes

why would employees get into fights over cones…

how is this going to affect anything… if anything rogues would BLOCK roads and individuals in

7 Likes

one saying they are misusing but other one say no

Not Nessisary

3 Likes

this never happens

you don’t design an item based off of what “rogues” would do. also rogues get BANNED within minutes if not seconds, there’s no reason to even consider that.

4 Likes

I’ve seen it happen

ask developers, ideas get shut down cuz of rouge’s. It’s preparation

3 Likes

where are you even getting this information from? what

4 Likes

DUDE WHAT R U EVEN SAYING

3 Likes

if employees are literally fighting over cones, they shouldn’t be employees

3 Likes

i am getting it off of the black market, they selling information

3 Likes

arguing over cones isn’t a legal reason for termination

3 Likes

ok now u just sound retarded if ur gonna comment on the forums at least bring up valid points

4 Likes